Israel is intensifying its focus on Syria, with increasing reports that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared, “We will meet in Damascus.” Whether this statement should be taken literally—indicating potential Israeli military advancement toward the Syrian capital—or interpreted as a political vision resulting from ongoing Israeli operations in southern Syria remains unclear. However, Netanyahu is advancing his strategy with unwavering U.S. support and little resistance. Having successfully disrupted regional power dynamics, he is working under the premise that Israel, a small nation in terms of territory, must expand—either through territorial annexation or by ensuring that neighboring countries fragment into smaller entities, making Israel the most dominant power in the region.
A Strategy of Fragmentation
Israel’s intentions are becoming increasingly evident through both public and private statements by its leadership. Israeli officials frequently discuss the prospect of federalism in Syria, the establishment of autonomous regions, and even the division of the country into smaller statelets. These objectives are being pursued not just through military operations—both aerial and ground—but also by fostering internal divisions within Syrian society. By exploiting conflicting interests among different ethnic and sectarian groups—particularly the Kurds, Druze, and Alawites—Israel is actively working to deepen Syria’s fragmentation.
Arab League and Human Rights Network Condemn Israeli Attacks on Syria
This strategy places Israel in direct strategic confrontation with multiple regional powers, particularly Arab states and Turkey, especially as Israel moves to counter Iran’s influence in Syria. The impact of this policy is particularly evident in southern Syria, where intensified Israeli military operations aim to prevent the area from becoming a stronghold similar to Hezbollah-controlled southern Lebanon. Furthermore, Israel has positioned itself as a protector of certain minority groups, such as the Druze and Kurds, using both military force and economic incentives to encourage the formation of autonomous zones that undermine Syria’s territorial integrity.
The ‘David Corridor’: A New Israeli Strategy
In a bid to consolidate its influence in Syria, Israel is reportedly working to establish a new military and logistical route dubbed the ‘David Corridor.’ This strategic line would connect southern Syria with eastern Syria, eventually linking Israel-controlled areas to Kurdish-controlled territories. Such a move would allow Israel to extend its presence towards Iraq and further cement its foothold in the region.
This project is particularly significant in light of U.S. discussions about withdrawing its military forces from Syria. If Washington pulls back from key areas like Al-Tanf, Israel could step in as the new dominant force in the region. By creating a continuous territorial corridor, Israel could secure its influence in both southern and eastern Syria, counterbalance Iran’s presence, and position itself as a major player in regional security.
A Looming Confrontation with Turkey
One of the most consequential outcomes of Israel’s Syria policy is its potential to provoke direct confrontation with Turkey. By advocating for Kurdish autonomy and supporting self-administration projects in northern and eastern Syria, Israel is directly challenging Turkish strategic interests. Ankara has long viewed the creation of a Kurdish entity along its border as an existential threat and has intervened militarily in northern Syria to prevent such an outcome.
For the Syrian government, led by President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, this presents a critical dilemma. Al-Sharaa has attempted to stabilize relations with the Kurds through economic agreements, particularly by purchasing oil from Kurdish-controlled regions. However, this approach risks legitimizing Kurdish self-rule, thereby playing into Israel’s broader strategy of promoting fragmentation. The situation becomes even more precarious as Israel increases its military pressure in southern Syria, effectively forcing Damascus to choose between confronting Israel or further alienating the Kurds.
The Regional Implications of Israel’s Strategy
The consequences of Israel’s expansionist policy in Syria extend beyond the country’s borders. The successful implementation of this strategy would not only lead to Syria’s disintegration into sectarian and ethnic enclaves but also impact neighboring states. Turkey, which has long opposed Kurdish independence movements, would find itself embroiled in an intensified conflict. Iraq, already dealing with instability and a strong Iranian presence, would have to contend with an expanded Israeli influence on its borders. Meanwhile, Lebanon could witness greater Israeli maneuvering aimed at curbing Hezbollah’s presence in Syria.
By accelerating its intervention in Syria, Israel is reshaping the region’s geopolitical landscape. Whether through military incursions, economic incentives, or political alliances, Israel is determined to ensure that Syria remains weak, divided, and unable to challenge its dominance. The unfolding developments suggest that Syria is not only a battleground for Israeli-Iranian rivalry but is also emerging as a key theater in a broader Israeli-Turkish struggle. As Israel intensifies its efforts, the region braces for the long-term consequences of this strategic recalibration.
This article was translated and edited by The Syrian Observer. The Syrian Observer has not verified the content of this story. Responsibility for the information and views set out in this article lies entirely with the author.
